GRE滿分作文分享

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

GRE滿分作文分享

  下面是一篇GRE官方給出滿分的ARGUMENT范文,我們來一起賞析,看看它為何能scored six

  The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

  Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

  Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

  北美GRE范文首段

  This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

  北美GRE作文范文中間段1

  The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

  北美GRE范文中間段2

  This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

  北美GRE寫作范文中間段3

  Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

  北美GRE范文末端

  In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment 。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

  GRE這篇官方欽定滿分的范文,其最明顯的優(yōu)點在于:

  1. 字數高達599words, GRE充分體現了字數為王的判分傾向。

  2. 標準的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中間三段,看上去很美。

  3. 沒有陳詞濫調、GRE滿篇廢話的模板式語言。

  只有以上三點離滿分還是很遠的,GRE之所以SIX,我看更重要的在于,每段各盡其責,既獨立又統(tǒng)一,形成了完整的ARGUMENT,specifically:

  1. 首段再現了原TOPIC的推理過程,GRE并指出其assumptions多有不適;尤其令閱卷人高興的是:首段在最后簡化羅列了推理中的三個問題。要知道美國人就喜歡的作文---總分式,在首段就把三個ideas羅列出來,然后在中間三段分別展開,先總后分,一目了然。

  2. 中一的TS -- The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.可謂是一針見血,一劍封喉。對于這樣嚴重的推理漏洞,如果不首先指出,其argument必然軟弱乏力。此所謂

  Topic中的 必削點,不可不察。

  3. 中二的TS This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.這可謂是劍走偏鋒,獨辟蹊徑,出人所料。文章竟然批評了Topic以錢為本經營理念,提出了要以人為本,這樣寫是有一定風險,畢竟這不是Issue。

  那本文是如何化險為夷的呢?且看本段最后一句this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.我不由得長舒一口,人家再次回歸了,又回到了Topic中以Money為本的推理。

  4. 中三的TS Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.這充分體現了作者不只是坐而論道的arguer,而是關心其可行性的現實主義者,考慮到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

  5. 末端不但對首段提出的論點做出了重復性的總結,GRE而且又不厭其煩地把中間三段的ideas一一羅列。如此啰嗦估計令某些同學略有不齒,但這恰恰是美國人的最愛,cultural shock了吧?

  

  下面是一篇GRE官方給出滿分的ARGUMENT范文,我們來一起賞析,看看它為何能scored six

  The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

  Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

  Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

  北美GRE范文首段

  This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

  北美GRE作文范文中間段1

  The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

  北美GRE范文中間段2

  This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

  北美GRE寫作范文中間段3

  Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

  北美GRE范文末端

  In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment 。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

  GRE這篇官方欽定滿分的范文,其最明顯的優(yōu)點在于:

  1. 字數高達599words, GRE充分體現了字數為王的判分傾向。

  2. 標準的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中間三段,看上去很美。

  3. 沒有陳詞濫調、GRE滿篇廢話的模板式語言。

  只有以上三點離滿分還是很遠的,GRE之所以SIX,我看更重要的在于,每段各盡其責,既獨立又統(tǒng)一,形成了完整的ARGUMENT,specifically:

  1. 首段再現了原TOPIC的推理過程,GRE并指出其assumptions多有不適;尤其令閱卷人高興的是:首段在最后簡化羅列了推理中的三個問題。要知道美國人就喜歡的作文---總分式,在首段就把三個ideas羅列出來,然后在中間三段分別展開,先總后分,一目了然。

  2. 中一的TS -- The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.可謂是一針見血,一劍封喉。對于這樣嚴重的推理漏洞,如果不首先指出,其argument必然軟弱乏力。此所謂

  Topic中的 必削點,不可不察。

  3. 中二的TS This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.這可謂是劍走偏鋒,獨辟蹊徑,出人所料。文章竟然批評了Topic以錢為本經營理念,提出了要以人為本,這樣寫是有一定風險,畢竟這不是Issue。

  那本文是如何化險為夷的呢?且看本段最后一句this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.我不由得長舒一口,人家再次回歸了,又回到了Topic中以Money為本的推理。

  4. 中三的TS Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.這充分體現了作者不只是坐而論道的arguer,而是關心其可行性的現實主義者,考慮到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

  5. 末端不但對首段提出的論點做出了重復性的總結,GRE而且又不厭其煩地把中間三段的ideas一一羅列。如此啰嗦估計令某些同學略有不齒,但這恰恰是美國人的最愛,cultural shock了吧?

  

信息流廣告 周易 易經 代理招生 二手車 網絡營銷 旅游攻略 非物質文化遺產 查字典 社區(qū)團購 精雕圖 戲曲下載 抖音代運營 易學網 互聯網資訊 成語 成語故事 詩詞 工商注冊 注冊公司 抖音帶貨 云南旅游網 網絡游戲 代理記賬 短視頻運營 在線題庫 國學網 知識產權 抖音運營 雕龍客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自學教程 常用文書 河北生活網 好書推薦 游戲攻略 心理測試 石家莊人才網 考研真題 漢語知識 心理咨詢 手游安卓版下載 興趣愛好 網絡知識 十大品牌排行榜 商標交易 單機游戲下載 短視頻代運營 寶寶起名 范文網 電商設計 免費發(fā)布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 經典范文 優(yōu)質范文 工作總結 二手車估價 實用范文 古詩詞 衡水人才網 石家莊點痣 養(yǎng)花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發(fā)型 搜搜作文 石家莊人才網 鋼琴入門指法教程 詞典 圍棋 chatGPT 讀后感 玄機派 企業(yè)服務 法律咨詢 chatGPT國內版 chatGPT官網 勵志名言 河北代理記賬公司 文玩 語料庫 游戲推薦 男士發(fā)型 高考作文 PS修圖 兒童文學 買車咨詢 工作計劃 禮品廠 舟舟培訓 IT教程 手機游戲推薦排行榜 暖通,電地暖, 女性健康 苗木供應 ps素材庫 短視頻培訓 優(yōu)秀個人博客 包裝網 創(chuàng)業(yè)賺錢 養(yǎng)生 民間借貸律師 綠色軟件 安卓手機游戲 手機軟件下載 手機游戲下載 單機游戲大全 免費軟件下載 石家莊論壇 網賺 手游下載 游戲盒子 職業(yè)培訓 資格考試 成語大全 英語培訓 藝術培訓 少兒培訓 苗木網 雕塑網 好玩的手機游戲推薦 漢語詞典 中國機械網 美文欣賞 紅樓夢 道德經 標準件 電地暖 網站轉讓 鮮花 書包網 英語培訓機構 電商運營
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品无码不卡| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合| 亚洲人成精品久久久久| 精品小视频在线| 日本三级韩国三级美三级91| 国产v精品欧美精品v日韩| 一本到视频在线| 欧美色欧美亚洲高清在线观看 | 国产免费久久精品久久久| 中文无码一区二区不卡αv| 精品久久久久久无码人妻蜜桃| 在线观看成人网站| 国产福利在线观看| 国产啪精品视频网站免费尤物| 中文字幕精品在线| 男人天堂伊人网| 国产福利精品一区二区| 久久久精品2019中文字幕2020 | 日本japanese丰满护士| 北条麻妃在线一区二区| 97在线公开视频| 青娱乐国产在线| 性之道在线观看| 亚洲欧美7777| 韩国女友的妈妈| 女人扒开裤子让男人捅| 亚洲国产精品久久久久秋霞小 | 99久久久国产精品免费蜜臀| 校花被折磨阴部流水| 啊啊啊好深视频| 中国一级特黄aa毛片大片| 涩涩涩在线视频| 国产成人+综合亚洲+天堂| 一级做性色a爰片久久毛片免费| 毛片免费视频播放| 国产自产在线视频一区| 久久精品国产一区二区三区| 秋葵视频在线观看在线下载| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩在线不卡 | 女的扒开尿口让男人桶|