GRE官方滿分范文之wage increased

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

GRE官方滿分范文之wage increased

  下面是一篇關于wage 的GRE官方滿分范文。這篇GRE官方范文的主要背景是大多數公司都同意認為相較于工作帶來的物理上的傷害的增加,員工的工資也應該增加。因為這會使員工在經濟上覺得工作的地方是安全的:他們減少自己的薪金總額的花銷然后存錢。

  The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

  Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

  Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

  This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

  The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

  This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

  Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

  In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment 。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

  上面就是GRE官方滿分范文的全部內容,這篇GRE官方范文的 字數高達599words, 充分體現了字數為王的判分傾向。另外這篇官方范文是 標準的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中間三段,看上去非常舒服;而且整篇文章沒有陳詞濫調、沒有滿篇廢話的模板式語言。這也是這篇文章能作為GRE官方范文的最主要原因。

  

  下面是一篇關于wage 的GRE官方滿分范文。這篇GRE官方范文的主要背景是大多數公司都同意認為相較于工作帶來的物理上的傷害的增加,員工的工資也應該增加。因為這會使員工在經濟上覺得工作的地方是安全的:他們減少自己的薪金總額的花銷然后存錢。

  The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

  Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

  Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

  This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

  The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

  This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

  Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

  In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment 。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

  上面就是GRE官方滿分范文的全部內容,這篇GRE官方范文的 字數高達599words, 充分體現了字數為王的判分傾向。另外這篇官方范文是 標準的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中間三段,看上去非常舒服;而且整篇文章沒有陳詞濫調、沒有滿篇廢話的模板式語言。這也是這篇文章能作為GRE官方范文的最主要原因。

  

信息流廣告 周易 易經 代理招生 二手車 網絡營銷 旅游攻略 非物質文化遺產 查字典 社區團購 精雕圖 戲曲下載 抖音代運營 易學網 互聯網資訊 成語 成語故事 詩詞 工商注冊 注冊公司 抖音帶貨 云南旅游網 網絡游戲 代理記賬 短視頻運營 在線題庫 國學網 知識產權 抖音運營 雕龍客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自學教程 常用文書 河北生活網 好書推薦 游戲攻略 心理測試 石家莊人才網 考研真題 漢語知識 心理咨詢 手游安卓版下載 興趣愛好 網絡知識 十大品牌排行榜 商標交易 單機游戲下載 短視頻代運營 寶寶起名 范文網 電商設計 免費發布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 經典范文 優質范文 工作總結 二手車估價 實用范文 古詩詞 衡水人才網 石家莊點痣 養花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發型 搜搜作文 石家莊人才網 鋼琴入門指法教程 詞典 圍棋 chatGPT 讀后感 玄機派 企業服務 法律咨詢 chatGPT國內版 chatGPT官網 勵志名言 河北代理記賬公司 文玩 語料庫 游戲推薦 男士發型 高考作文 PS修圖 兒童文學 買車咨詢 工作計劃 禮品廠 舟舟培訓 IT教程 手機游戲推薦排行榜 暖通,電地暖, 女性健康 苗木供應 ps素材庫 短視頻培訓 優秀個人博客 包裝網 創業賺錢 養生 民間借貸律師 綠色軟件 安卓手機游戲 手機軟件下載 手機游戲下載 單機游戲大全 免費軟件下載 石家莊論壇 網賺 手游下載 游戲盒子 職業培訓 資格考試 成語大全 英語培訓 藝術培訓 少兒培訓 苗木網 雕塑網 好玩的手機游戲推薦 漢語詞典 中國機械網 美文欣賞 紅樓夢 道德經 標準件 電地暖 網站轉讓 鮮花 書包網 英語培訓機構 電商運營
主站蜘蛛池模板: 曰批免费视频观看40分钟| 99久久精品国产亚洲| 金8天国欧美视频hd黑白| 杨幂精品国产福利在线| 国产精品αv在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区二厂| 97久久免费视频| 欧美黑人xxxx性高清版| 国语对白一区二区三区| 亚洲综合男人的天堂色婷婷| 99国产欧美久久久精品蜜芽| 污视频网站在线观看免费| 菠萝菠萝蜜视频在线| 欧美野外疯狂做受xxxx高潮| 国产香蕉一区二区在线网站| 亚洲欧美综合一区| 三浦惠理子在线播放| 精品人妻少妇一区二区| 彩虹男gary网站| 免费一级欧美大片在线观看| 久久久久无码国产精品不卡| 蜜桃av噜噜一区二区三区| 成年女人色毛片| 免费在线观看毛片| 99re5精品视频在线观看| 精品欧美亚洲韩国日本久久| 好男人看视频免费2019中文| 亚洲视频一区在线| 窝窝午夜看片成人精品| 玩肥熟老妇BBW视频| 国内精品国产三级国产AV| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水| chinesehd国产刺激对白| 欧美黑人巨大白妞出浆| 国产精品一区二区三乱码| 久久婷婷丁香五月综合五| 在线a免费观看最新网站| 欧美成年黄网站色视频| 国产成人久久av免费| 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区| 成人免费大片免费观看网站|