2023年考研英語閱讀習(xí)題演練

雕龍文庫 分享 時(shí)間: 收藏本文

2023年考研英語閱讀習(xí)題演練

  It was a ruling that had consumers seething with anger and many a free trader crying foul. On November 20th the European Court of Justice decided that Tesco, a British supermarket chain, should not be allowed to import jeans made by America s Levi Strauss from outside the European Union and sell them at cut-rate prices without getting permission first from the jeans maker. Ironically, the ruling is based on an EU trademark directive that was designed to protect local, not American, manufacturers from price dumping. The idea is that any brand-owning firm should be allowed to position its goods and segment its markets as it sees fit: Levi s jeans, just like Gucci handbags, must be allowed to be expensive.   Levi Strauss persuaded the court that, by selling its jeans cheaply alongside soap powder and bananas, Tesco was destroying the image and so the value of its brandswhich could only lead to less innovation and, in the long run, would reduce consumer choice. Consumer groups and Tesco say that Levi s case is specious. The supermarket argues that it was just arbitraging the price differential between Levi s jeans sold in America and Europea service performed a million times a day in financial markets, and one that has led to real benefits for consumers. Tesco has been selling some 15,000 pairs of Levi s jeans a week, for about half the price they command in specialist stores approved by Levi Strauss. Christine Cross, Tesco s head of global non-food sourcing, says the ruling risks creating a Fortress Europe with a vengeance。   The debate will rage on, and has implications well beyond casual clothes 。 The question at its heart is not whether brands need to control how they are sold to protect their image, but whether it is the job of the courts to help them do this. Gucci, an Italian clothes label whose image was being destroyed by loose licensing and over-exposure in discount stores, saved itself not by resorting to the courts but by ending contracts with third-party suppliers, controlling its distribution better and opening its own stores. It is now hard to find cut-price Gucci anywhere.   Brand experts argue that Levi Strauss, which has been losing market share to hipper rivals such as Diesel, is no longer strong enough to command premium prices. Left to market forces, so-so brands such as Levi s might well fade away and be replaced by fresher labels. With the courts protecting its prices, Levi Strauss may hang on for longer. But no court can help to make it a great brand again.   1. Which of the following is not true according to Paragraph 1?   [A]Consumers and free traders were very angry.   [B]Only the Levis maker can decide the prices of the jeans.   [C] The ruling has protected Levis from price dumping.   [D] Levis jeans should be sold at a high price .   2. Guccis success shows that _______.   [A]Gucci has successfully saved its own image.   [B] It has changed its fate with its own effort.   [C]Opening its own stores is the key to success.   [D] It should be the courts duty to save its image.   3. The word specious in the context probably means _______.   [A]responsible for oneself   [B] having too many doubts   [C] not as it seems to be   [D]raising misunderstanding   4. According to the passage, the doomed fate of Levis is caused by such factors except that ________.   [A]the rivals are competitive   [B]it fails to command premium prices   [C]market forces have their own rules   [D]the court fails to give some help   5. The authors attitude towards Levis prospect seems to be _______.   [A] biased   [B] indifferent   [C] puzzling   [D] objective   答案:BBCDD

  

  It was a ruling that had consumers seething with anger and many a free trader crying foul. On November 20th the European Court of Justice decided that Tesco, a British supermarket chain, should not be allowed to import jeans made by America s Levi Strauss from outside the European Union and sell them at cut-rate prices without getting permission first from the jeans maker. Ironically, the ruling is based on an EU trademark directive that was designed to protect local, not American, manufacturers from price dumping. The idea is that any brand-owning firm should be allowed to position its goods and segment its markets as it sees fit: Levi s jeans, just like Gucci handbags, must be allowed to be expensive.   Levi Strauss persuaded the court that, by selling its jeans cheaply alongside soap powder and bananas, Tesco was destroying the image and so the value of its brandswhich could only lead to less innovation and, in the long run, would reduce consumer choice. Consumer groups and Tesco say that Levi s case is specious. The supermarket argues that it was just arbitraging the price differential between Levi s jeans sold in America and Europea service performed a million times a day in financial markets, and one that has led to real benefits for consumers. Tesco has been selling some 15,000 pairs of Levi s jeans a week, for about half the price they command in specialist stores approved by Levi Strauss. Christine Cross, Tesco s head of global non-food sourcing, says the ruling risks creating a Fortress Europe with a vengeance。   The debate will rage on, and has implications well beyond casual clothes 。 The question at its heart is not whether brands need to control how they are sold to protect their image, but whether it is the job of the courts to help them do this. Gucci, an Italian clothes label whose image was being destroyed by loose licensing and over-exposure in discount stores, saved itself not by resorting to the courts but by ending contracts with third-party suppliers, controlling its distribution better and opening its own stores. It is now hard to find cut-price Gucci anywhere.   Brand experts argue that Levi Strauss, which has been losing market share to hipper rivals such as Diesel, is no longer strong enough to command premium prices. Left to market forces, so-so brands such as Levi s might well fade away and be replaced by fresher labels. With the courts protecting its prices, Levi Strauss may hang on for longer. But no court can help to make it a great brand again.   1. Which of the following is not true according to Paragraph 1?   [A]Consumers and free traders were very angry.   [B]Only the Levis maker can decide the prices of the jeans.   [C] The ruling has protected Levis from price dumping.   [D] Levis jeans should be sold at a high price .   2. Guccis success shows that _______.   [A]Gucci has successfully saved its own image.   [B] It has changed its fate with its own effort.   [C]Opening its own stores is the key to success.   [D] It should be the courts duty to save its image.   3. The word specious in the context probably means _______.   [A]responsible for oneself   [B] having too many doubts   [C] not as it seems to be   [D]raising misunderstanding   4. According to the passage, the doomed fate of Levis is caused by such factors except that ________.   [A]the rivals are competitive   [B]it fails to command premium prices   [C]market forces have their own rules   [D]the court fails to give some help   5. The authors attitude towards Levis prospect seems to be _______.   [A] biased   [B] indifferent   [C] puzzling   [D] objective   答案:BBCDD

  

信息流廣告 周易 易經(jīng) 代理招生 二手車 網(wǎng)絡(luò)營銷 旅游攻略 非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn) 查字典 社區(qū)團(tuán)購 精雕圖 戲曲下載 抖音代運(yùn)營 易學(xué)網(wǎng) 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)資訊 成語 成語故事 詩詞 工商注冊 注冊公司 抖音帶貨 云南旅游網(wǎng) 網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲 代理記賬 短視頻運(yùn)營 在線題庫 國學(xué)網(wǎng) 知識產(chǎn)權(quán) 抖音運(yùn)營 雕龍客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自學(xué)教程 常用文書 河北生活網(wǎng) 好書推薦 游戲攻略 心理測試 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 考研真題 漢語知識 心理咨詢 手游安卓版下載 興趣愛好 網(wǎng)絡(luò)知識 十大品牌排行榜 商標(biāo)交易 單機(jī)游戲下載 短視頻代運(yùn)營 寶寶起名 范文網(wǎng) 電商設(shè)計(jì) 免費(fèi)發(fā)布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 經(jīng)典范文 優(yōu)質(zhì)范文 工作總結(jié) 二手車估價(jià) 實(shí)用范文 古詩詞 衡水人才網(wǎng) 石家莊點(diǎn)痣 養(yǎng)花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發(fā)型 搜搜作文 石家莊人才網(wǎng) 鋼琴入門指法教程 詞典 圍棋 chatGPT 讀后感 玄機(jī)派 企業(yè)服務(wù) 法律咨詢 chatGPT國內(nèi)版 chatGPT官網(wǎng) 勵(lì)志名言 河北代理記賬公司 文玩 語料庫 游戲推薦 男士發(fā)型 高考作文 PS修圖 兒童文學(xué) 買車咨詢 工作計(jì)劃 禮品廠 舟舟培訓(xùn) IT教程 手機(jī)游戲推薦排行榜 暖通,電地暖, 女性健康 苗木供應(yīng) ps素材庫 短視頻培訓(xùn) 優(yōu)秀個(gè)人博客 包裝網(wǎng) 創(chuàng)業(yè)賺錢 養(yǎng)生 民間借貸律師 綠色軟件 安卓手機(jī)游戲 手機(jī)軟件下載 手機(jī)游戲下載 單機(jī)游戲大全 免費(fèi)軟件下載 石家莊論壇 網(wǎng)賺 手游下載 游戲盒子 職業(yè)培訓(xùn) 資格考試 成語大全 英語培訓(xùn) 藝術(shù)培訓(xùn) 少兒培訓(xùn) 苗木網(wǎng) 雕塑網(wǎng) 好玩的手機(jī)游戲推薦 漢語詞典 中國機(jī)械網(wǎng) 美文欣賞 紅樓夢 道德經(jīng) 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)件 電地暖 網(wǎng)站轉(zhuǎn)讓 鮮花 書包網(wǎng) 英語培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu) 電商運(yùn)營
主站蜘蛛池模板: 你懂的在线视频网站| 97国产在线播放| 性欧美人与动物| 亚洲人成网国产最新在线| 精品无码成人片一区二区98| 国产精品妇女一二三区| 中文www新版资源在线| 欧美aⅴ菲菲影视城视频| 免费看欧美一级特黄a大片一| 久久久噜久噜久久gif动图| 天天av天天翘天天综合网| 久久久男人天堂| 欧美影院在线观看| 免费人妻av无码专区| 越南大胆女人体337p欣赏| 国产精品爆乳在线播放第一人称 | 久久狠狠爱亚洲综合影院| 熟女精品视频一区二区三区| 国产三级放荡的护士| 大尺度视频网站久久久久久久久| 好男人好资源在线观看免费| 玩弄丰满少妇XXXXX性多毛| 波霸在线精品视频免费观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品偷一| 黄a视频在线观看| 国产免费插插插| 奇米精品一区二区三区在| 91大神在线免费观看| 88国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 99热这里只有精品66| www320999com| a一级毛片免费高清在线| 99国内精品久久久久久久| 99在线免费观看| 狠狠人妻久久久久久综合蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合| 2022年亚洲午夜一区二区福利| 奇米第四色在线播放| 两个人看的WWW在线观看| 日本口工全彩漫画| 久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美|