新版gre寫作新題庫：argument86
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內(nèi)有關(guān)argument86的寫作部分：
題目：
The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.
When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating rsums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
當XYZ裁員的時候，它雇傭了Delany人事公司在這些下崗員工有需要的時候為他們在寫簡歷和提高面試技巧方面提供幫助。下崗員工從Delany的服務中極大受益：去年獲得了Delany幫助的員工找工作比沒有找Delany的員工快的多。最近，有提案提出用收費較少的Walsh人事公司代替Delany。這將是一個錯誤，因為在8年前，XYZ使用的就是Walsh，我們當時裁減的員工只有一半在一年之內(nèi)找到了工作。而且，Delany顯然更好，理由是它的員工更多，分支機構(gòu)也更多。不論如何，去年Delany的客戶平均用六個月找到工作，而Walsh的客戶平均用了9個月。
寫一篇回應，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據(jù)是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument86的內(nèi)容從今天起小編就給大家連續(xù)提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內(nèi)容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內(nèi)有關(guān)argument86的寫作部分：
題目：
The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company.
When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating rsums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not. Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year. Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices. After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
當XYZ裁員的時候，它雇傭了Delany人事公司在這些下崗員工有需要的時候為他們在寫簡歷和提高面試技巧方面提供幫助。下崗員工從Delany的服務中極大受益：去年獲得了Delany幫助的員工找工作比沒有找Delany的員工快的多。最近，有提案提出用收費較少的Walsh人事公司代替Delany。這將是一個錯誤，因為在8年前，XYZ使用的就是Walsh，我們當時裁減的員工只有一半在一年之內(nèi)找到了工作。而且，Delany顯然更好，理由是它的員工更多，分支機構(gòu)也更多。不論如何，去年Delany的客戶平均用六個月找到工作，而Walsh的客戶平均用了9個月。
寫一篇回應，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據(jù)是如何強化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument86的內(nèi)容從今天起小編就給大家連續(xù)提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內(nèi)容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
