GRE作文入門和進階二十四

雕龍文庫 分享 時間: 收藏本文

GRE作文入門和進階二十四

  (病歷文)

  In this argument, the arguer recommends us to use Adams, one of the two leading real estate firms in our town, to sell our homes if you want to instead of Fitch, the other leading one. To justify his conclusion, the arguer provides the clear evidence that Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast to the number 25 of Fitch, and even many of which are only part-time. In addition, he cited the fresh statistics of revenues of both Adams and Fitch, which respectively are $168,000 and $144,000. To make it more conceivable, the arguer even lists out a self-experienced case to exhibit the superior sell speed of Adams to Fitch. Although all the evidences above seem reasonable, a careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless it is.

  In the first place, the arguer unfairly assumes Adams service is better than Fitchs with the assumption that more agents, more satisfaction. The 40 agents in Adams might be poorly trained and unqualified with an extremely low work efficiency, thus enlarging the number of the agents is the only feasible compensation. While Fitchs 25 agents may be well trained and be rich in experience, although many of them work only part-time, under the present work condition it is enough. And also the quality of the service cant be oversimplified to only a factor of the number of employees, which, in our common sense, has no necessary correlation. It is some other things should be taken into consideration, such as social reputation, the feedbacks of customers and the companys culture and spiritual, to avoid making the assertion too unwarranted.

  In the second place, the statistics offered by the arguer cant elucidate anything. It seems true that Adams achievement is greater than Fitchs through the comparison of revenues, but the data itself is too vague to be informative. Taking into account the service charge, which cant be omitted in this case, we absolutely have adequate reasons to doubt the charge from Adams is far larger than Fitch, which eventually leads to such a gap. Another possibility of the result is contributing to the types of house they are entrusted to sell, since no evidence showed that Adams can afford to sell the lower-price estates while Fitch can assume the opposite ones, thus the phenomenon arises.

  Last but not least, in short of legitimacy is that Fitch really sells homes slower than Adams does. According to the arguers narrative, he entrusted his home to Fitch ten years ago when the balance of offer-request heavily outweighed the left side and Fitch selling it in more than four months is nothing but a miracle. Adams, instead, sold his another home in one month last year during which the request for house might be booming as a result of influx of the foreign immigrants. Under this circumstance, Adams success, however, is merely ordinary. Besides, the two houses sold out no doubt have natural differences, which tightly related to the smooth process of selling, such as location, structure, areas, and materials. The arguer thus makes so hasty a generalization regardless of these crucial points.

  As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned in lack of some indispensable evidence. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would demonstrate that the superior quality of Adams agents and the relatively lower charge comparable to Fitchs. Additionally, more details should be evinced, concerning the actual estate situation in those periods of time and fundamental instructions of the two sold houses, to rule out the above-mentioned possibilities. (587 words)

  點評:該范文充斥著上面討論的各種毛病,僅開頭就131字,加上結尾超過200字,已經遠遠超過正文1/3篇幅,是不可取的。許多模式句型充斥,結尾老套,不值得學習借鑒。另外很多考生關心這樣一來字數就不合要求。ETS從來沒有對作文字數有要求,盡管網上流行說法認為閱卷者將字數列為打分項目之一,但是在ETS公布的評分標準中是覓不著蹤跡的,況且ETS極講究科學性,不會以貌取人,但求以理服人,這

  從他考試的設計可以看出來。所以正常的ARGUMENT作文可以在350500字之間,而ISSUE可在450600之間,這是按正常打字速度與思維速度指定的標準。很多網上作文包括我這里的某些范文都有遠遠超過500,600字的,很少是在真正全封閉作業下,45分鐘或30分鐘內完成的,在考試時間內,按上述標準的字數作文拿滿分是綽綽有余的,事實說明一切,我的諸多戰友,包括前面提及的Violet,從來都是靠5步一殺,3步一槍,(500字左右ISSUE,300字左右ARGUMENT),在4,6級詞匯范圍內穩拿5分6分,可見一斑。不相信的考生應該自己在PP2、PP3的作文模考中親身體驗,我會在最后推薦大家一個行之有效的快速練習作文速度和質量槍手作文速成訓練法,我們這一輩稱為替身殺手的人都是這樣練出來的。

  

  (病歷文)

  In this argument, the arguer recommends us to use Adams, one of the two leading real estate firms in our town, to sell our homes if you want to instead of Fitch, the other leading one. To justify his conclusion, the arguer provides the clear evidence that Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast to the number 25 of Fitch, and even many of which are only part-time. In addition, he cited the fresh statistics of revenues of both Adams and Fitch, which respectively are $168,000 and $144,000. To make it more conceivable, the arguer even lists out a self-experienced case to exhibit the superior sell speed of Adams to Fitch. Although all the evidences above seem reasonable, a careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless it is.

  In the first place, the arguer unfairly assumes Adams service is better than Fitchs with the assumption that more agents, more satisfaction. The 40 agents in Adams might be poorly trained and unqualified with an extremely low work efficiency, thus enlarging the number of the agents is the only feasible compensation. While Fitchs 25 agents may be well trained and be rich in experience, although many of them work only part-time, under the present work condition it is enough. And also the quality of the service cant be oversimplified to only a factor of the number of employees, which, in our common sense, has no necessary correlation. It is some other things should be taken into consideration, such as social reputation, the feedbacks of customers and the companys culture and spiritual, to avoid making the assertion too unwarranted.

  In the second place, the statistics offered by the arguer cant elucidate anything. It seems true that Adams achievement is greater than Fitchs through the comparison of revenues, but the data itself is too vague to be informative. Taking into account the service charge, which cant be omitted in this case, we absolutely have adequate reasons to doubt the charge from Adams is far larger than Fitch, which eventually leads to such a gap. Another possibility of the result is contributing to the types of house they are entrusted to sell, since no evidence showed that Adams can afford to sell the lower-price estates while Fitch can assume the opposite ones, thus the phenomenon arises.

  Last but not least, in short of legitimacy is that Fitch really sells homes slower than Adams does. According to the arguers narrative, he entrusted his home to Fitch ten years ago when the balance of offer-request heavily outweighed the left side and Fitch selling it in more than four months is nothing but a miracle. Adams, instead, sold his another home in one month last year during which the request for house might be booming as a result of influx of the foreign immigrants. Under this circumstance, Adams success, however, is merely ordinary. Besides, the two houses sold out no doubt have natural differences, which tightly related to the smooth process of selling, such as location, structure, areas, and materials. The arguer thus makes so hasty a generalization regardless of these crucial points.

  As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned in lack of some indispensable evidence. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would demonstrate that the superior quality of Adams agents and the relatively lower charge comparable to Fitchs. Additionally, more details should be evinced, concerning the actual estate situation in those periods of time and fundamental instructions of the two sold houses, to rule out the above-mentioned possibilities. (587 words)

  點評:該范文充斥著上面討論的各種毛病,僅開頭就131字,加上結尾超過200字,已經遠遠超過正文1/3篇幅,是不可取的。許多模式句型充斥,結尾老套,不值得學習借鑒。另外很多考生關心這樣一來字數就不合要求。ETS從來沒有對作文字數有要求,盡管網上流行說法認為閱卷者將字數列為打分項目之一,但是在ETS公布的評分標準中是覓不著蹤跡的,況且ETS極講究科學性,不會以貌取人,但求以理服人,這

  從他考試的設計可以看出來。所以正常的ARGUMENT作文可以在350500字之間,而ISSUE可在450600之間,這是按正常打字速度與思維速度指定的標準。很多網上作文包括我這里的某些范文都有遠遠超過500,600字的,很少是在真正全封閉作業下,45分鐘或30分鐘內完成的,在考試時間內,按上述標準的字數作文拿滿分是綽綽有余的,事實說明一切,我的諸多戰友,包括前面提及的Violet,從來都是靠5步一殺,3步一槍,(500字左右ISSUE,300字左右ARGUMENT),在4,6級詞匯范圍內穩拿5分6分,可見一斑。不相信的考生應該自己在PP2、PP3的作文模考中親身體驗,我會在最后推薦大家一個行之有效的快速練習作文速度和質量槍手作文速成訓練法,我們這一輩稱為替身殺手的人都是這樣練出來的。

  

信息流廣告 周易 易經 代理招生 二手車 網絡營銷 旅游攻略 非物質文化遺產 查字典 社區團購 精雕圖 戲曲下載 抖音代運營 易學網 互聯網資訊 成語 成語故事 詩詞 工商注冊 注冊公司 抖音帶貨 云南旅游網 網絡游戲 代理記賬 短視頻運營 在線題庫 國學網 知識產權 抖音運營 雕龍客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自學教程 常用文書 河北生活網 好書推薦 游戲攻略 心理測試 石家莊人才網 考研真題 漢語知識 心理咨詢 手游安卓版下載 興趣愛好 網絡知識 十大品牌排行榜 商標交易 單機游戲下載 短視頻代運營 寶寶起名 范文網 電商設計 免費發布信息 服裝服飾 律師咨詢 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 經典范文 優質范文 工作總結 二手車估價 實用范文 古詩詞 衡水人才網 石家莊點痣 養花 名酒回收 石家莊代理記賬 女士發型 搜搜作文 石家莊人才網 鋼琴入門指法教程 詞典 圍棋 chatGPT 讀后感 玄機派 企業服務 法律咨詢 chatGPT國內版 chatGPT官網 勵志名言 河北代理記賬公司 文玩 語料庫 游戲推薦 男士發型 高考作文 PS修圖 兒童文學 買車咨詢 工作計劃 禮品廠 舟舟培訓 IT教程 手機游戲推薦排行榜 暖通,電地暖, 女性健康 苗木供應 ps素材庫 短視頻培訓 優秀個人博客 包裝網 創業賺錢 養生 民間借貸律師 綠色軟件 安卓手機游戲 手機軟件下載 手機游戲下載 單機游戲大全 免費軟件下載 石家莊論壇 網賺 手游下載 游戲盒子 職業培訓 資格考試 成語大全 英語培訓 藝術培訓 少兒培訓 苗木網 雕塑網 好玩的手機游戲推薦 漢語詞典 中國機械網 美文欣賞 紅樓夢 道德經 標準件 電地暖 網站轉讓 鮮花 書包網 英語培訓機構 電商運營
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本精品久久久久中文字幕8| h在线观看免费| 中文字幕久精品免费视频| gogogo高清在线播放| 亚洲国产精品成人综合久久久 | 182tv午夜线路一线路二| 苏玥马强百文择| 永久免费av无码网站大全| 日本大片免费一级| 国内揄拍国内精品| 国产精品制服丝袜| 午夜性色吃奶添下面69影院| 亚洲人6666成人观看| 一级淫片免费看| 国产一区在线mmai| 特级深夜a级毛片免费观看| 日本福利视频一区| 日本久久综合久久综合| 小草视频免费观看| 国产天堂亚洲国产碰碰| 亚洲狠狠狠一区二区三区| 中文字幕日韩一区二区三区不 | 国产v片成人影院在线观看| 狠狠久久精品中文字幕无码| 日本一区二区三区在线视频观看免费 | 免费无码又爽又黄又刺激网站| 九九热线有精品视频99| 99精品国产在热久久| 美女大量吞精在线观看456| 曰批全过程免费视频网址| 国产高跟踩踏vk| 国产精品久久国产精品99盘| 免费在线h视频| 中文字幕一区二区三区精彩视频| 久久国产精品女| 欧美综合国产精品日韩一| 女性无套免费网站在线看| 国产999视频| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕 | 欧美大陆日韩一区二区三区| 大伊香蕉在线观看视频wap|