新版gre寫作新題庫：argument81
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內有關argument81的寫作部分：
題目：
The following appeared in a business magazine.
As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded that the canned tuna did not, after all, pose a health risk. This conclusion is based on tests performed on samples of the recalled cans by chemists from Promofoods; the chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
中文翻譯：
去年由于有大量消費者投訴說產生了眩暈和惡心，Promofoods要求800萬罐金槍魚回收檢測。Promofoods下結論說這些罐頭根本不含任何有健康危害的化學物質。這一結論基于這樣的事實，即Promofoods的化學家測試了回收的罐頭樣本，并發現8種最常見的導致眩暈和惡心癥狀的化學物質中，有五種都沒有在任何被測試的罐頭中被發現。化學家確實發現剩下三種受懷疑的化學物質在所有其他罐頭食品中都存在，并指出這在所有的關頭中都存在，屬于正?，F象。
寫一篇回應，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的建議以及得出這一建議結論的論證過程是合理的，并務請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議結論的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument81的內容從今天起小編就給大家連續提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
gre改革后新版gre寫作新題庫里的作文方面的一個重要變化是有了指導語。而指導語的作用是有助于我們的邏輯性寫作，以下是新版gre寫作新題庫內有關argument81的寫作部分：
題目：
The following appeared in a business magazine.
As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded that the canned tuna did not, after all, pose a health risk. This conclusion is based on tests performed on samples of the recalled cans by chemists from Promofoods; the chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
中文翻譯：
去年由于有大量消費者投訴說產生了眩暈和惡心，Promofoods要求800萬罐金槍魚回收檢測。Promofoods下結論說這些罐頭根本不含任何有健康危害的化學物質。這一結論基于這樣的事實，即Promofoods的化學家測試了回收的罐頭樣本，并發現8種最常見的導致眩暈和惡心癥狀的化學物質中，有五種都沒有在任何被測試的罐頭中被發現。化學家確實發現剩下三種受懷疑的化學物質在所有其他罐頭食品中都存在，并指出這在所有的關頭中都存在，屬于正?，F象。
寫一篇回應，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的建議以及得出這一建議結論的論證過程是合理的，并務請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議結論的。
此上就是新版gre寫作新題庫 argument81的內容從今天起小編就給大家連續提供新版gre寫作新題庫argument部分的內容。希望大家能夠在練習中提高自己的寫作水平。
