2024屆高考英語二輪復(fù)習(xí)閱讀理解訓(xùn)練七十集之連載（11）

由雕龍文庫 分享時(shí)間：2024-03-30 18:39:16 收藏本文

　　2024高考英語二輪閱讀理解訓(xùn)練七十集之連載（11）

　　2024高考訓(xùn)練題。閱讀理解閱讀下列短文，從每題所給的四個(gè)選項(xiàng)（A、B、C和D）中，選出最佳選項(xiàng)。Two new studies suggest that modern running shoes could increase the risk of injuries to runners.

　　One study involved sixty-eight healthy young women and men who ran at least twenty-four kilometers a week. The runners were observed on a treadmill machine (跑步機(jī)). Sometimes they wore running shoes. Other times they ran barefoot (赤腳).

　　Researchers from the JKM Technologies company in Virginia, the University of Virginia and the University of Colorado did the study.

　　They found that running shoes create more stress that could damage knees, hips and ankle joints than running barefoot. They observed that the effect was even greater than the effect reported earlier for walking in high heels.

　　The study appeared in the official scientific journal of The American Academy of Physical Medicine.

　　The other study appeared in the journal Nature. It compared runners in the United States and Kenya. The researchers were from Harvard University in Massachusetts, Moi University in Kenya and the University of Glasgow in Scotland.

　　They divided the runners into three groups. One group had always run shoeless. Another group had always run with shoes. And the third group had changed to shoeless running.

　　Runners who wear shoes usually come down heel first. That puts great force on the back of the foot. But the study found that barefoot runners generally land on the front or middle of their foot. That way they ease into their landing and avoid striking their heel.

　　Harvard’s Daniel Lieberman led the study. He says the way most running shoes are designed may explain why those who wear them land on their heels. The heel of the shoe is bigger and heavier than other parts of the shoe, so it would seem more likely to come down first. Also, the heel generally has thick material under it to soften landings.

　　But the researchers do not suggest that runners immediately start running barefoot. They say it takes some training. And there can be risks, like running when your feet are too cold to feel if you get injured.

　　The study was partly supported by Vibram, which makes a kind of footwear that it says is like running barefoot. The findings have gotten a lot of attention. But the researchers say there are many problems in the way the press has reported in their paper. So they have tried to explain their findings on a Harvard Website.

　　1. What’s the main idea of the passage?

　　A. Walking in high heels could cause less serious effects than running barefoot.

　　B. Two new discoveries encourage people to run in high heels.

　　C. Running in shoes is partly good to runners.

　　D. Two new studies prove running without shoes is beneficial to runners in most cases.

　　2. Which part of our body could be injured if we run in running shoes?

　　A. Toes.

　　B. Hips.

　　C. Feet.

　　D. Legs.

　　3. What can we learn from the passage?

　　A. The way that we run by landing on the front or middle of our foot could avoid damaging our heel.

　　B. We should start running barefoot in no time.

　　C. Running in modern running shoes could cause more serious effects than running in high heels.

　　D. We won’t be injured if we run barefoot.

　　4. What is the writer’s attitude towards the use of the modern running shoes?

　　A. Persuasive.

　　B. Negative.

　　C. Objective. D. Supportive.

　　參考答案1—4、DBAC

　　閱讀理解。

　　The summer I was ten, my mother decided to bring us to the world of art. My brother and I were not very excited when we realized what my mother meant. What she meant was not that we could take drawing classes or painting classes but that we would have to spend one afternoon a week with her at the Fine Arts Museum. Before each visit to the museum, she made us read about artists and painting styles(風(fēng)格). It was almost as bad as being in school. Who wants to spend the summer thinking about artists when you could be with your friends at the swimming pool?

　　First we had to read about ancient Egyptians(古埃及人) and their strange way of painting faces and then go to look at them at the museum. My 12-year-old brother thought this was so funny, but I was not interested. Later we had to learn about artists in the Middle Ages who painted people wearing strange long clothing. We had to look at pictures of fat babies with wings and curly (鬈曲的) hair and with no clothes on flying around the edges of paintings. I certainly couldn't see what was so great about art.

　　On our last visit to the museum, something happened when I saw a painting by a woman called Mary. In it, a woman was reading to a child. The colors were soft and gentle, and you could tell by the mother' s expression how happy she was just to be with the child. I couldn't stop looking at this painting ! I wanted to see every painting Mary had ever made! It was really worth looking at so many paintings to find a painter who could interest me so much.

　　1. The aim of the mother' s plan was to _________.

　　A. take them to visit the museum

　　B. introduce them to the world of art

　　C. ask them to read about artists

　　D. show them different painting styles

　　2. What was the writer' s experience in the museum before the last visit?

　　A. She came to feel her mother' s love.

　　B. She liked many paintings.

　　C. She hardly enjoyed herself.

　　D. She could understand the pictures of fat babies.

　　3. What made the writer go through a change that summer?

　　A. One of Mary's paintings.

　　B. A strange way of painting.

　　C. Artists in the Middle Ages.

　　D. Her mother' s instruction.

　　4. From the text, we can see _________.

　　A. the importance of curiosity

　　B. the effect of art

　　C. the value of learning

　　D. the power of family education

　　【參考答案.B

　　2.C

　　3.A

　　4.B

　　2024高考訓(xùn)練題。閱讀理解閱讀下列短文，從每題所給的四個(gè)選項(xiàng)（A、B、C和D）中，選出最佳選項(xiàng)。I prefer Lynne Truss’s phraseology: I am a grammar “sticker”. And, like Truss – author of Eats, shoots & Leaves – I have a “zero tolerance” approach to grammar mistakes that make people look stupid.

　　Now, Truss and I disagree on what it means to have “zero tolerance”. She thinks that people who mix up basic grammar “deserve to be struck by lightning, hacked (砍) up on the spot and buried in an unmarked grave”, while I just think they deserve to be passed over for a job – even if they are otherwise qualified for the position.

　　Everyone who applies for a position at either of my companies, iFixit or Dozuki, takes a compulsory grammar test. If job hopefuls can’t distinguish between “to” and “too”, their applications go into the bin.

　　Of course, we write for a living. iFixit.com is the world’s largest online repair manual (指南), and Dozuki helps companies write their own technical documentation, like paperless work instructions and step-by-step user manuals. So, it makes sense that we’ve made a strong strike against grammar errors.

　　But grammar is relevant for all companies. Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the Internet. And, for better or worse, people judge you if you can’t tell the difference between “their” “there” and “they’re”.

　　Good grammar makes good business sense – and not just when it comes to hiring writers. Writing isn’t in the official job description of most people in our office. Still, we give our grammar test to everybody, including our salespeople, our operations staff, and our programmers.

　　Grammar signifies more than just a person’s ability to remember high school English. I’ve found that people who make fewer mistakes on a grammar test also make fewer mistakes when they are doing something completely unrelated to writing – like stocking shelves or labeling parts. It is the same with programmers. Applicants who don’t think writing is important are likely to think lots of other things also aren’t important.

　　1. The author agrees with Lynne Truss in that ________.

　　A. grammar mistakes can’t be tolerated

　　B. books on grammar make people stupid

　　C. people need to learn basic grammar

　　D. grammar mistakes are absolutely unavoidable

　　. What’s the author’s “zero tolerance” approach to these job seekers who mix up basic grammar?

　　A. They should be left out for a job.

　　B. They have to correct their mistakes.

　　C. They aren’t qualified for their jobs.

　　D. They must be severely punished.

　　3. Which of the following is TRUE of iFixit and Dozuki?

　　A. Only one of them has a compulsory grammar test.

　　B. They are companies where one learns grammar.

　　C. Grammar is quite important for their existence.

　　D. They depend on grammar correction for a living.

　　4. What can we learn from the text?

　　A. Companies giving grammar tests may have no good business sense.

　　B. Grammar becomes unimportant as language is constantly changing.

　　C. A “zero tolerance” approach to grammar errors might seem a little unfair.

　　D. People who pay attention to writing may pay attention to other things.

　　參考答案AACD

　　閱讀理解。

　　Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed about attitudes to dirt.

　　In the early 16th century, people thought that dirt on the skin was a means to block out disease, as medical opinion had it that washing off dirt with hot water could open up the skin and let ills in. A particular danger was thought to lie in public baths. By 1538, the French king had closed the bath houses in his kingdom. So did the king of England in 1546. Thus began a long time when the rich and the poor in Europe lived with dirt in a friendly way. Henry IV, King of France, was famously dirty. Upon learning that a nobleman had taken a bath, the king ordered that, to avoid the attack of disease, the nobleman should not go out.

　　Though the belief in the merit of dirt was long-lived, dirt has no longer been regarded as a nice neighbor ever since the 18th century. Scientifically speaking, cleaning away dirt is good to health. Clean water supply and hand washing are practical means of preventing disease. Yet, it seems that standards of cleanliness have moved beyond science since World War Ⅱ. Advertisements repeatedly sell the idea: clothes need to be whiter than white, cloths ever softer, surfaces to shine. Has the hate for dirt, however, gone too far?

　　Attitudes to dirt still differ hugely nowadays. Many first-time parents nervously try to warn their children off touching dirt, which might be responsible for the spread of disease.On the contrary, Mary Ruebush, an American immunologist(免疫學(xué)家)，encourages children to play in the dirt to build up a strong immune system. And the latter position is gaining some ground.

　　1. The kings of France and England in the 16th century closed bath houses because

　　A. they lived healthily in a dirty environment.

　　B. they thought bath houses were too dirty to stay in

　　C. they believed disease could be spread in public baths

　　D. they considered bathing as the cause of skin disease

　　2.Which of the following best describes Henry IV’s attitude to bathing?

　　A. Afraid.

　　B. Curious.

　　C. Approving.

　　D. Uninterested.

　　3. How does the passage mainly develop?

　　A. By providing examples.

　　B. By making comparisons.

　　C. By following the order of time.

　　D. By following the order of importance.

　　4. What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?

　　A. To stress the role of dirt.

　　B. To introduce the history of dirt.

　　C. To call attention to the danger of dirt.

　　D. To present the change of views on dirt.

　　【參考答案】1—4、CA CD

　　閱讀理解

　　A man was working on his motorcycle in his yard.Suddenly it started to move.The man，still holding the hand lebars，was dragged through the glass doors，along with the motorcycle，and was thrown onto the floor inside the house.The wife ran in and found her husband lying on the floor，cut and bleeding.She ran to call an ambulance (救護(hù)車)．

　　The ambulance arrived and they took the man to the hospital.The wife picked up the motorcycle and pushed it outside.There was gas all over the floor，so the wife got some paper towels，cleaned the gas with them，and threw them in the toilet.After he was treated，the man returned home.Not long after that he went to the bathroom，sat down on the toilet and smoked a cigarette.Sitting there，he finished the cigarette and threw it into the toilet.The wife，who was in the kitchen，heard the loud explosion (爆炸聲) and her husband screaming.

　　She ran into the bathroom，and there she found her husband lying on the floor！His trousers had been blown away and his buttocks and other parts of his body were covered with burns！The wife again ran to the phone to call an ambulance.The same people came！While they were carrying the husband down the stairs to the street，one of the men asked the wife how the husband had burned himself.She told them and they started laughing very hard.One of them fell and the husband fell，too.The poor husband fell down the remaining stairs and broke his arm.

　　1．What most probably made the motorcycle start moving?

　　A．The man himself started it to see if it was working.

　　B．His wife did it for him to check if there was something working.

　　C．The motorcycle started by itself.

　　D．The man started the motorcycle without knowing it.

　　解析：　根據(jù)文章第一段第一句“A man was working on his motorcycle in his yard.Suddenly it started to move.”可知the man很可能無意當(dāng)中發(fā)動(dòng)了車。

　　答案：　D

　　2．What did the wife do after the first accident?

　　A．She did nothing except calling the policemen.

　　B．She cleaned the gas with paper towels and threw them into the toilet.

　　C．She took the motorcycle and pushed it into the room.

　　D．She took her hushand to the hospital.